Homicidal (Or What Happens In Denmark…)

Dual Role Banners

This post is part of the Dual Roles Blogathon

hosted by Christina Wehner and Ruth of Silver Screenings.

homBefore The Skin I Live In, Sleepaway Camp, or Dressed To Kill, there was William Castle’s Homicidal. If you’ve never seen it, you should probably stop reading. There’s no way for me to talk about this movie without giving away the ending. There. You’ve been warned.

That said, let’s get the reveal right out of the way. Jean Arless (the one-time stage name of Joan Marshall) plays Emily, a live-in caretaker for a woman named Helga. Castle apparently preferred the name Jean because it was more gender neutral. Arless, you see, also plays Emily’s, uh, “husband,” Warren.

Arless is compelling in both roles. It’s claimed that Warren’s lines were dubbed as Arless supposedly had the ability to alter her voice making it much deeper.

The eeriness of her appearance is amped up nicely by makeup that achieves an Uncanny Valley effect regardless of gender. It only gets weirder from there with a plot that is deliciously convoluted and, off the screen, a bit silly.

Warren, you see, was born female. He was delivered by a nurse, the aforementioned Helga (the local doctor being conveniently sick). Helga and Warren’s mother conspire to list Warren as male on the birth certificate and  get the county clerk to go along with this.

Warren is raised male and has a half sister, Miriam Webster (unfortunate name). Their parents die in a car crash when the children are young, and Warren goes off to Denmark with Helga. He returns at the age of twenty with Helga (who has had a stroke) and her live-in caretaker, Emily.

Before we meet Warren, in fact, Emily kills a justice of the peace then returns home to tell Helga who is mute and confined to a wheelchair. Come to think of it, a number of folks in Castle’s movies can’t talk. Huh.

Anyway, now that Warren is about to claim his inheritance, he has to kill everyone in the way. He does this through Emily. Emily kills the justice of the peace (who happened to be the county clerk who signed the birth certificate), Helga, and intends to kill Miriam.

Convoluted. Deliciously. And nearly as full of holes as Blackburn, Lancashire. For example:

  • Why does Emily have to kill Miriam? Miriam only gets the inheritance, it turns out, if there is no male heir, but there is, kind of: Warren.
  • How is the house is exactly the same as it was during Warren and Miriam’s childhood? Warren was in Denmark. Miriam doesn’t live there. One assumes she was brought up by her biological mother (we don’t really get the backstory on that).
  • Why doesn’t Helga ever write anyone a note saying something like, “Emily is going to kill me,” or even, “Help!”
  • Speaking of Helga, what happened when she took Warren to Denmark, land of the first sex reassignment surgery? Well, as the detective says at the end, “What happened there we don’t know.” Or do we?
  • Possibly the biggest plot hole of all, why doesn’t anyone recognize Emily? The big reveal is merely Emily taking off her wig. Nobody saw any resemblance this entire time? Really?

There are also numerous comparisons made between Homicidal and Psycho. To be fair, Castle may well have lifted a few shots from Hitchcock:

balsom breslin


It’s more difficult, though, to determine who’s copying whom in terms of film exploitation, showmanship, and straight up gimmickry. Hitchcock could grind out the hype in true P.T. Barnum style, but Castle was masterful at this. Pretty much every movie had a gimmick: audiences voting on endings, life insurance policies for getting scared to death, Percepto.

Homicidal was no exception. It opens with Castle doing needlepoint and talking to the audience about the story. Très Alfred Hitchcock Presents.

Before the big reveal, Castle hits us with a Fright Break. A clock comes up on the screen, and anyone too frightened to see the end of the movie has 45 seconds to leave the theater.

Beautiful stuff.

But there are some other significant differences between the two, especially in terms of Norman Bates and Warren. Norman dressed up like his mother and killed people. Warren lived most of his life as male even though he is biologically female.

The point is for Emily/Warren this is not a gender identification issue. Warren was brought up male in order to inherit his father’s estate which supposedly was only going to go to a son. As is so often the case, it’s all about the money.

Here’s one more important distinction. Norman Bates hears his mother’s voice in his head. Emily/Warren put up a façade to claim an inheritance. The point, however, is that this was not a gender identification story as much as a long-term grift. Warren maintained an illusion while Norman is trapped in a delusion.

It’s sort of a noir hybrid of Victor Victoria, Sleepaway Camp, and Psycho all revolving around Warren masquerading as Emily even though biologically he is actually a woman.

Unless, y’know, Denmark which would just tangle the narrative even further.

Surely there’s a splendid sociological commentary to be made here.


9 thoughts on “Homicidal (Or What Happens In Denmark…)

  1. That has to take the cake as the most convoluted and long-term con ever. It sounds like truly unique film, which I am still curious to see, even though I read the spoilers. 🙂 It was interesting to read about Castle and his gimmicks, too. I’ve only seen one – much earlier film of if his, which I enjoyed quite a lot.

    I wonder if anyone took him up on the offer to leave before the end…

    So glad you could join us in the blogathon!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I’ve never heard of a “fright break” before, but then I don’t watch a lot of movies that require “fright breaks”. Was this a thing, or was it just for this film?

    This sounds like a bit of a mind-blowing film, even though there appear to be some plot holes. Jean Arless must have had amazing talent to play both these roles.

    Thanks for joining the blogathon, and thanks for the introduction to this film!

    Liked by 1 person

    • The Fright Break was one of William Castle’s many, many gimmicks. I think Hitchcock picked up an idea or two from him in promoting Psycho. In his show “This Filthy World,” John Waters talks extensively about Castle, and it’s really entertaining.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Right? I mean the gender bending goes way beyond Norman Bates I think and is pretty risky for 1961. Two years earlier he had Vincent Price experimenting with LSD in The Tingler. Daring stuff.


  3. Sounds like the perfect movie for a Drive-In movie blog (of which mine is one…) I have seen quite a few Castle movies, haven’t even ran across this title before, though. Gotta check it out.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave A Comment (Before It's Too Late)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s